- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ironwood County (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG, I see very little about this fictional county beyond the descriptions of the relevant books or statements from the author himself. Nsteffel (talk) 19:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:41, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 09:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 09:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to author John Schreiber. This fictional county does not meet WP:GNG, have been unable to find any suitable citations for notability but some of the information could be used to expand author article.Coolabahapple (talk) 16:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete instead as I considered simply mentioning at the author's article but there's simply not much for that so delete at best. SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nom and the above editors. Not enough in-depth coverage to show how this fictional county is notable. Onel5969 TT me 13:14, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.